Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MARCH 2026

The Future: AI And The Erosion (Or Evolution) Of Judicial Discretion

GGI | Global Alliance
GGI | Global Alliance
Contributor
Explore more from GGI | Global Alliance

The UE Law, anchored in principles of fairness, justice, and integrity, contemplates a world defined by human interactions (e.g. erroneous payment, building inadvertently across property lines, receipt of stolen funds...

IsraelLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The litigation team at Soroker Agmon Nordman Riba recently submitted a closing brief in a decade-long civil litigation which originated in the aftermath of the infamous Madoff affair, predominantly based on the Israeli Law of Unjust Enrichment, 5739-1979 (the "UE Law"). This landmark case brings to the forefront a critical tension between the rigid application of law and the necessity of dynamic judicial discretion.

Judicial discretion as a judicial safeguard

The UE Law, anchored in principles of fairness, justice, and integrity, contemplates a world defined by human interactions (e.g. erroneous payment, building inadvertently across property lines, receipt of stolen funds as donations, etc.). At its core, the law seeks to prevent individuals from benefiting at another's expense without legal justification.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from