4,188 results found

C assisted its clients in obtaining photocopying equipment. C put forward R as the preferred supplier for its clients.

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act introduces sweeping changes to subscription regulations in the UK, with enforcement beginning Spring 2027.

The Supreme Court has confirmed that a contract can validly prohibit variations being made to it orally.

In Extra MSA Services Cobham Ltd v Accor UK Economy Hotels Ltd [2011] EWHC 775 (CL) the claimant (a developer) made an application for a declaration of the High Court that the right to terminate an agreement for lease to construct a hotel (the defendant/tenant being a hotel chain) was not conditional on the proper performance by the claimant of its obligations under the agreement.

A Hungarian consumer entered into a mobile phone contract with Pannon. The terms of that contract provided that the court in Pannon’s locality - some 275 km away from where the consumer lived - would have exclusive jurisdiction over any disputes.

This case concerned the contract for Omega’s sale of animal by-products to Pears. Pears claimed that the products had to be of category 3 standard rather than category 1 standard and Omega had breached the contract by supplying only to the category 1 standard.

There is some debate as to whether a smart contract fulfils the requirement that a contract must be signed.

Waveley and Ross River were parties to a JV Agreement to undertake a property development project.

Wincanton provided delivery services for DRL, a white goods retailer, to DRL’s customers.

On 9 February 2026 the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) issued updated guidance on financial sanctions enforcement and monetary penalties.

Hackney Empire entered into an agreement with Sunley Turriff Construction to refurbish the Hackney Empire Theatre.

Such rights are not uncommonly provided for in various types of commercial contract, to address new products becoming available, changes in supply arrangements or the procurement process once the contract expires.

Even if that was wrong, it is an established principle that the operative part of an agreement always takes precedence over a recital.

When a lender sought to enforce a security letter's jurisdiction clause to serve proceedings abroad, the High Court examined whether the letter constituted an enforceable contract. The case turned on a fundamental question of contract law: was there valid consideration to support the security arrangement?

Harsco Infrastructure Services Limited –v- Bellway Homes Limited [2011] All ER (B203).

Amberley ran a care home for a number of people with mental illnesses. In the contract between the residents and Amberley, the fees clause stated: "The level of fees is subject to review as costs increase. No fee level is stated here as a standard, due to the reviews".

The Ministry of Justice has published the UK government's response to the consultation on joining the Hague Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign...

This podcast episode explores recent developments in commercial litigation, including a High Court decision on privilege and company directors, new ADR resources, and significant contract law rulings on termination damages and force majeure clauses. The discussion features insights from disputes partners and knowledge counsel on these evolving legal principles.