Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

134 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Foreign Companies' Victories In Chinese Courts Support Forum Non Conveniens Motions In U.S. Courts

    A series of recent intellectual property case victories by foreign plaintiffs against Chinese companies in Chinese courts has relevance for the forum non conveniens doctrine as a critical defense motion in U.S. courts.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jones Day
    Jones Day
  • Article

    New Opinions By China's Supreme People's Court – Guidance On Optimizing Judicial Resources

    Potential redefinition of the address for document service and the assumption of attorney's fees.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Clyde & Co
Clyde & Co
  • Article

    특허 무효 시 침해 분쟁에서 피고의 감정료 부담

    최근, 중국 최고인민법원 지식재산법정은 특허권 침해분쟁 사건의 심리 중 특허권이 무효로 선고되어원고의 소가 먼저 각하된 경우, 침해소송에서 발생한 감정비는 일반적으로 원고가 부담한다는 재판요지를 공개한다.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Kangxin
    Kangxin
  • Article

    SPC Ruling: If A Product Loses Money, Does The Company Still Have To Pay The Inventor?

    China's Supreme People's Court has issued a landmark ruling on employee invention remuneration, establishing that payment is contingent upon the invention generating actual economic benefits after implementation. The case involved a dispute between a former senior director and his employer over compensation for a pharmaceutical patent, with the court clarifying calculation methods, contribution rates, and the burden of proof in such disputes.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Article

    海南省、特許の権利化・侵害紛争を初の合同審理 行政・司法の手続きを同日実施★★★

    海南省知識産権局の統括・調整の下、海口市知的財産権保護センターは、国家知識産権局(CNIPA)専利局復審・無効審判部、海南自由貿易港知識産権法院と連携し、北京、海口、連雲港の知財関連機関の協力を得て、海南省で初となる特許の有効性判断と侵害紛争の合同審理を実施した。複
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Kangxin
    Kangxin
  • Article

    Insight into China’s Revision on Civil Procedure Law

    A third revision of the PRC Civil Procedure Law has been adopted and is scheduled to take effect on 1 January 2013.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    King & Wood Mallesons
    King & Wood Mallesons
  • Article

    Supreme People's Court Overturns Prior Rulings, Validating Maxeon's Core BC Patent In Second Instance

    The Supreme People's Court of China has issued a landmark ruling in a high-stakes patent dispute involving foundational back-contact solar cell technology, overturning two consecutive adverse decisions...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Purplevine IP Group
    Purplevine IP Group
  • Article

    Interim Measures In Judicial Proceedings In China

    1. If failure to take immediate preservation measures would result in irreparable harm to a party's rights, the party may apply to the Court for pre-litigation property preservation.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    GRATA International
    GRATA International
  • Article

    Chinese Court Enforces A Foreign Judgement For The First Time On The Basis Of Reciprocity

    China has for the longest time been known for adopting one of the most restrictive reciprocity systems in the world.
    GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Clyde & Co
    Clyde & Co
  • Article

    Supreme People's Court Issues Rules Of Procedure For The China International Commercial Courts

    On 1 July 2018, the Supreme People's Court of China (SPC) promulgated Provisions on Several Issues Regarding the Establishment of International Commercial Courts
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
    Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
  • Article

    Navigating Dispute Resolution in China: A Step-by-Step Guide

    Key steps in the dispute resolution process, detailing how each phase contributes to resolving conflicts efficiently.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    R&P China Lawyers
    R&P China Lawyers
  • Article

    国家知識産権局商標局が『マドリッド国際商標登録における不使用取消手続きの一部法律文書の送付形式調整に関する通知』を発表

    中国の商標局が、マドリッド国際商標登録における不使用取消手続きの法律文書送付方法を大幅に変更します。
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Kangxin
    Kangxin
  • Article

    Art-Mosaic v. Hongguan Trading (2022)*

    On 7 September 2017, Art-Mosaic Co., Ltd. ("Art-Mosaic"), an Uzbekistan-based company, executed a purchase contract (the "Contract") via email with a Chinese...
    ChinaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    最高法判决:发现技术问题本身,可以赋予专利创造性

    The Supreme People's Court issued landmark rulings on two patent disputes that establish new standards for determining patent validity and scope of protection. In one case, the court ruled that discovering a non-obvious technical problem can establish inventiveness even when using conventional solutions, while in another, it clarified how to properly interpret dependent claims that are substantively independent from their parent claims.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Article

    最高法:创造性判断,警惕“后见之明”

    最高人民法院通过三起实用新型和发明专利案件,明确了专利创造性判断中的关键原则:技术改进动机的认定、技术问题发现的价值,以及形式从
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Article

    最高法:前案诉讼中的持续侵权,赔偿范围如何认定?

    A patent infringement case reaches China's Supreme People's Court, examining whether damages from a prior lawsuit's litigation period should be included in a subsequent case. The court addresses critical questions about calculating compensation periods when patent holders file multiple lawsuits against the same infringer for continuing violations.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Article

    Ongoing Developments With Follow-on Antitrust Lawsuits

    Follow-on antitrust lawsuits are claims for civil damages for suffering losses from monopolistic conduct filed after antitrust administrative investigations and penalty procedures.
    ChinaAntitrust/Competition Law
    Jingtian & Gongcheng
    Jingtian & Gongcheng
  • Article

    Application Of New Evidence Rules In Labor Dispute Cases

    The Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence for Civil Actions, effective as of May 1st, 2020, is the first comprehensive amendment to the evidence rules of the 2002 version.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
  • Article

    Supreme Court Ruling: How To Determine Liability For Chip Packaging Companies In Layout Design Infringement Cases

    The Supreme People's Court issued a judgment in a dispute over exclusive rights to an integrated circuit layout design.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Article

    最高法判决:擅自使用他人技术成果申请专利,侵害署名权需担责

    最高人民法院对一起发明创造发明人署名权纠纷作出终审判决。该判决明确,发明人署名权纠纷案件中,当事人主张其为发明创造的发明人的,应就其对发明创造作出实质性贡献承担举证责任。
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Showing 21–40 of 134 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics