Emanating from an opposed trade mark opposition, Rwanda's
Registry recently handed down a decision, where the Registry was
called on to consider if the trade marks BIGG BOSS and BIGG POPS,
when used in relation to confectionery, were confusingly and
deceptively similar. In its decision, the Registry referred to
foreign case law which emphasised that (i) both the visual and
phonetic similarities between two marks must be considered when
assessing potential confusion; and (ii) that the marks under
examination cannot be dissected and must be compared holistically.
The Registry held that focussing on the individual parts of the two
marks is irrelevant and that it is the overall impression that
should be considered. In considering if BIGG BOSS and BIGG POPS are
confusingly similar, the Registry found that (i) the word
“BIGG” and “BOSS” were distinctive, while
the word “POPS” was not distinctive in the context of
confectionery; and (ii) that the parties' marks were