It is no news that we are in the age of rapid technological
advancement, and artificial intelligence (AI) has become deeply
integrated into various aspects of our lives, promising efficiency,
accuracy, and convenience. However, when it comes to making legal
decisions, the reliance on machines and algorithms poses
significant risks and challenges. While AI can augment human
decision-making processes, entrusting it with the authority to make
legal judgments independently is a perilous path fraught with
complexities and ethical dilemmas.
One of the fundamental limitations of AI in legal
decision-making is its inability to grasp the nuanced complexities
of human behavior, emotions, and societal context. For instance,
when prompt engineering on ChatGPT, one often has to qualify their
prompts to give it additional context and yet more often than not,
ChatGPT still misses the mark, especially as it relates to complex
everyday issues. Legal cases often involve intricate
