Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 APRIL 2014

Non-Assignment/Pledge Clauses Usually Without Effect Vis-À-Vis Third Parties

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Contributor
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Our clients are increasingly operating in South-East Asia and require legal assistance in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

A recent Supreme Court ruling has put a practical end to the effectiveness of clauses in contracts prohibiting assignment or pledge of receivables.

NetherlandsInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

A recent Supreme Court ruling has put a practical end to the effectiveness – in relation to third parties – of clauses in contracts prohibiting assignment or pledge of receivables. The ruling means that if a debtor does not want a creditor to freely assign his position to a third party, the debtor will have to specifically provide in the contract that the clause should have effect vis-à-vis third parties.

We recently issued a Legal Alert about this ruling (in Dutch only).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from