Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JUNE 2012

You Win Some, You Lose Some: Dutch Telecom Incumbent KPN

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Contributor
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Our clients are increasingly operating in South-East Asia and require legal assistance in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

All attacks by the cable companies and KPN's downstream customers against the 2008 conditional first phase approval of the creation by KPN of its glass fibre joint venture Reggefiber were unsuccessful.

NetherlandsAntitrust/Competition Law

All attacks by the cable companies and KPN's downstream customers against the 2008 conditional first phase approval of the creation by KPN of its glass fibre joint venture Reggefiber were unsuccessful. The Rotterdam District Court recently annulled the NMa's approval decision, but upheld its legal consequences: the setting up of the joint venture.1 In a 2010 interlocutory ruling, the court found that the NMa based its decision that no second phase investigation into the joint venture was required on insufficient grounds.2 However, after a further substantiation of the NMa's reasoning, the court was convinced that the bundling of the optical fibre network activities of KPN and Reggefiber in the joint venture was unproblematic. The appeals by downstream customers of KPN against the effectiveness of a number of the remedies in the NMa's 2008 decision were just as unsuccessful.3 Recently, the NMa also gave unconditional first phase approval to the acquisition of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from