Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JANUARY 2016

Transcripts Of Oral Leniency Statements Should Be Disclosed

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Contributor
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Our clients are increasingly operating in South-East Asia and require legal assistance in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Oral leniency statements do not enjoy the intended protection against disclosure.

NetherlandsAntitrust/Competition Law

Oral leniency statements do not enjoy the intended protection against disclosure. The highest Dutch administrative appeal court recently ruled that copies of transcripts of oral statements by leniency applicants should be provided to other cartel participants in aid of their defence in appeal proceedings. The Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets unsuccessfully argued that disclosure would harm the effectiveness of its leniency programme.

In appeal proceedings against a cartel decision, the Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets, ACM, had requested that copies of the transcripts of the oral leniency statements be disclosed only to the Trade and Industry Appeals Tribunal, not to the cartel participants appealing the ACM's decision. Counsel for these cartel participants had earlier obtained access to the transcripts at the ACM offices (without being allowed to make copies). This is also common practice in cartel proceedings filed with the European Commission.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from