Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MAY 2013

Need To Beat The "Fear Factor"? UTPs In The B2B Supply Chain

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Contributor
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Our clients are increasingly operating in South-East Asia and require legal assistance in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek

Most terms in contractual relations are the result of tough but fair negotiations between trading partners.

NetherlandsAntitrust/Competition Law
Jaap De Keijzer
Jaap De Keijzer
Jolling De Pree
Jolling De Pree
Erik Pijnacker Hordijk
Erik Pijnacker Hordijk
Martijn Snoep
Martijn Snoep
Author LinkedIn connections

Most terms in contractual relations are the result of tough but fair negotiations between trading partners. However, sometimes "weaker" business partners are confronted by unfair trading practices (UTPs) and do not speak up in fear of losing the commercial relationship. UTPs initiatives at national, EU and ECN level initially focused on the food supply chain but have now been extended to the non-food side. At national level, pilots have been set up with a number of representatives of the agro-food sector and the textiles industry to implement a code of conduct similar to the "Principles of Good Practice" drafted by the Expert Platform set up by the European Commission within the framework of the High Level Forum for a Better Functioning Food Supply Chain.1 At EU level, the European Commission is taking stock of UTPs in both the food and non-food sector through a Green Paper. Interested parties have until 30 April 2013 to submit their views to the Commission on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Dutch Competition Regulator's Call-in Power Passes "First Phase" As Lower House Adopts Bill

The Netherlands is poised to grant its competition authority unprecedented power to scrutinize mergers that fall below traditional notification thresholds, targeting potentially harmful transactions such as roll-up strategies and killer acquisitions. While the Dutch House of Representatives has approved the bill despite criticism from the Council of State, the legislation introduces an asymmetric threshold system and raises standard notification requirements, fundamentally reshaping the country's merger con
NetherlandsAntitrust/Competition Law
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Article

Dutch Call-in Powers Bill Moves Forward: House Of Representatives Adopts Draft Bill After Significant Amendments

The Dutch House of Representatives has adopted a private member's bill introducing call-in powers for the Dutch competition authority ACM, enabling review of below-threshold transactions while simultaneously raising mandatory notification thresholds. This reform shifts Dutch merger control from a purely threshold-based system toward a discretionary, risk-based regime that could significantly impact dealmakers pursuing roll-up strategies, buy-and-build models, or acquisitions in concentrated markets.
NetherlandsAntitrust/Competition Law
Loyens & Loeff
Loyens & Loeff
Article

Dutch House Of Representatives Approves Proposed ACM Merger Control Call-In Power

The Dutch House of Representatives has approved legislation granting the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets unprecedented power to review and potentially block mergers and acquisitions that fall below existing turnover thresholds. This reform addresses concerns about "killer acquisitions" and strategic buy-and-build strategies that may escape traditional merger control scrutiny...
GlobalAntitrust/Competition Law
Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Article

Trading Disruption Risk Expected For EU Companies Listed Or Traded Outside The EU

A critical deadline looms for European issuers with securities traded outside the EU, as a key grandfathering clause under the CSD Regulation expires on 17 January 2027. Without timely regulatory action, third-country central securities depositories like DTC may be forced to suspend services to affected EU issuers, potentially disrupting trading in their equity and debt instruments on international markets.
European UnionInternational Law
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Article

EU Companies Listed Or Traded Outside EU To Be Aware Of Upcoming Expiry Of Key Trade-facilitating Clause

A critical deadline looms for European issuers with securities traded outside the EU, as a key grandfathering clause under the CSD Regulation expires on 17 January 2027. Without timely regulatory action, third-country central securities depositories like DTC may be forced to suspend services to affected EU issuers, potentially disrupting trading in their equity and debt instruments on international markets.
European UnionFinance and Banking
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
Article

Dutch Competition Regulator's Call-in Power Passes "First Phase" As Lower House Adopts Bill

The Netherlands is poised to grant its competition authority unprecedented power to scrutinize mergers that fall below traditional notification thresholds, targeting potentially harmful transactions such as roll-up strategies and killer acquisitions. While the Dutch House of Representatives has approved the bill despite criticism from the Council of State, the legislation introduces an asymmetric threshold system and raises standard notification requirements, fundamentally reshaping the country's merger con
NetherlandsAntitrust/Competition Law
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek