Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JULY 2024

News - Litigation | Num. 6 | June 2024

Müggenburg, Gorches y Peñalosa, S.C. (MGPS)
Müggenburg, Gorches y Peñalosa, S.C. (MGPS)
Contributor
Müggenburg, Gorches y Peñalosa, S.C. (MGPS)

Müggenburg, Gorches y Peñalosa, S.C. (MGPS)

Our firm is formed by highly reputed and well experienced attorneys providing their clients with...

View firm profile
Explore more from Müggenburg, Gorches y Peñalosa, S.C. (MGPS)

THE FIRST CHAMBER OF THE SCJN RULED THAT ARTICLE 73 OF THE ANTITRUST LAW WHICH EMPOWERS THE FEDERAL ECONOMIC COMPETITION...

MexicoLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

ADMINISTRATIVE. THE FIRST CHAMBER OF THE SCJN RULED THAT ARTICLE 73 OF THE ANTITRUST LAW WHICH EMPOWERS THE FEDERAL ECONOMIC COMPETITION COMMISSION ("COFECE") TO REQUEST REPORTS AND DOCUMENTS, DOES NOT VIOLATE THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY

More Information...

The First Chamber of the SCJN, resolved the constitutional appeal 565/2023 and determined that Article 73 of the Antitrust Law does not violate the principle of legal certainty by not establishing a time limit within the normative hypothesis for the competent authority to request information and documents from individuals.

This decision is based on the considerations that the legislator, when issuing the Antitrust Law -Federal Economic Competition Law-, established the figure of prescription not only in relation to the authority's power to impose sanctions but also, expressly, in relation to the authority's power to initiate investigations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from