Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 SEPTEMBER 2024

Monthly Newsletter Litigation | No. 9 | September 2024

Müggenburg, Gorches y Peñalosa, S.C. (MGPS)
Müggenburg, Gorches y Peñalosa, S.C. (MGPS)
Contributor
Müggenburg, Gorches y Peñalosa, S.C. (MGPS)

Müggenburg, Gorches y Peñalosa, S.C. (MGPS)

Our firm is formed by highly reputed and well experienced attorneys providing their clients with...

View firm profile
Explore more from Müggenburg, Gorches y Peñalosa, S.C. (MGPS)

The Sixteenth Circuit Court in Administrative Matters of the First Circuit resolved the appeal 498/2023 and determined that a provisional injunction in an amparo claim is applicable with restorative

MexicoLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

CIVIL. A CIRCUIT COURT "CC" DETERMINED THAT THE SUPPLEMENTATION OF A DEFICIENT COMPLAINT IS APPLICABLE IN THE APPEAL WHEN IT INCLUDES THE DISCONNECTION OF ELECTRICAL SUPPLY AND THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE ELECTRIC INDUSTRY LAW, EVEN IF THE CASE IS DISMISSED ON THE GROUNDS THAT ONLY THE CORRESPONDING CONTRACT WAS APPLIED More Information...

The Second Circuit Court in Civil Matters of the Seventh Circuit, resolved the constitutional appeal 333/2023 and determined that: (i) when the disconnection of electrical supply is based on the commercial contract for the basic supply of low-voltage electricity in the postpaid modality, the application of Article 41 of the Electric Industry Law enters into effect, and (ii) that the supplementation of a deficient complaint by the Plaintiff, provided for in Section VI of Article 79 of the Amparo Law, is applicable in the appeal when such disconnection is challenged along with the unconstitutionality of Article 41

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from