Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MAY 2015

EMIR – Another Amendment To The UCITS Directive?

GVZH Advocates
GVZH Advocates
Contributor
GVZH Advocates

GVZH Advocates

GVZH Advocates is a modern and sophisticated legal practice comprised of top-tier professionals,...

View firm profile
Explore more from GVZH Advocates

Under European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), certain OTC financial derivative transactions became subject to clearing with a central counterparty with an aim of reducing the counterparty risk of the parties to the said transactions.

MaltaFinance and Banking

Under European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), certain OTC financial derivative transactions became subject to clearing with a central counterparty with an aim of reducing the counterparty risk of the parties to the said transactions.

The question arises as to how the limits on counterparty risk in OTC financial derivative transactions that are centrally cleared should be calculated by UCITS and whether UCITS should apply the same rules to both OTC financial derivative transactions that are centrally cleared and exchange-trade derivatives (ETDs). Indeed it is argued that the UCITS Directive  should no longer distinguish between OTC financial derivative transactions and ETDs but between cleared and non-cleared OTC financial derivative transactions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from