Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2026

EU Securitisation Vehicles Likely To Continue To Be Exempt From Interest Limitation Rules

The European Court of Justice's Advocate General has delivered a significant opinion on whether Luxembourg properly implemented the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive when it classified securitisation entities as exempt financial undertakings. The case examines whether Luxembourg's approach to exclude these entities from interest limitation rules aligns with EU law and the principle of equal treatment, with potential implications for how member states interpret ATAD's financial undertaking exemptions.

LuxembourgTax

On 18 June 2026, Advocate General Juliane Kokott delivered her opinion in Case C‑138/24, European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, concerning Luxembourg’s implementation of the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (“ATAD” or Directive). In the case at hand, she examined whether Luxembourg was entitled, when implementing ATAD, to treat securitisation entities within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 as “financial undertakings” exempt from the interest limitation rule.

Background to the case

As a reminder, the infringement proceedings stem from Luxembourg’s implementation of ATAD in 2018, when securitisation entities within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 were included among the “financial undertakings” and thereby excluded from the scope of the interest limitation rule. The European Commission argued that this approach went beyond ATAD, because EU securitisation entities are not expressly included in the exhaustive list of financial undertakings set out in Article

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from