Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MARCH 2018

Recent Restrictive Covenant Cases Show Trend Against Employers

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
Explore more from Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

Employers had a difficult time enforcing restrictive trade clauses (RTCs) during 2017. While the Employment and Labour Relations Court has held that RTCs are constitutional ...

KenyaEmployment and HR

Co-authored by Sonal Sejpal, Tabitha Joy Raore, and Milly Mbedi of Anjarwalla & Khanna

Employers had a difficult time enforcing restrictive trade clauses (RTCs) during 2017. While the Employment and Labour Relations Court has held that RTCs are constitutional and generally enforceable if reasonable, they need to be balanced against the employee's circumstances, and it is the latter that has prevailed in recent cases.

RTCs must comply with the Contracts in Restraint of Trade Act (Chapter 24, Laws of Kenya)(CRTA), to stand any chance of enforcement. This requires that RTCs are sufficiently limited as to time, scope, and geographical coverage and are reasonable.

This needs to be balanced against an employee's right to employment that has—in recent cases—been prioritized over the employer's right to protect its business interests. A key example is Credit Reference Bureau Holdings Ltd v Kunyiha, decided in 2017, which left many questioning the effectiveness of an RTC.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from