Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JUNE 2017

Limits On Legal Professional Privilege

Baker & Partners LLP
Baker & Partners LLP
Contributor
Baker & Partners LLP

Baker & Partners LLP

The Cayman Islands office was opened in late 2020 with Robert Jones as the sole attorney. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker & Partners LLP

The High Court has recently restricted the ability to rely on privilege. Although SFO -v- ENRC is an English authority, Jersey generally follows English principles of privilege.

JerseyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The High Court has recently restricted the ability to rely on privilege.  Although SFO -v- ENRC is an English authority, Jersey generally follows English principles of privilege.

In 2011 ENRC, a mining company, began an internal investigation (prompted by a whistle blower) into potential corruption in its operations in Kazakhstan and Africa.  ENRC was subsequently contacted by the SFO and encouraged to co-operate and self-report.

The talks broke down in 2013 and the SFO launched a formal criminal investigation shortly after. The SFO applied for disclosure of ENRC documents from 2011 to 2013.  ENRC objected on grounds of litigation and legal advice privilege.  The documents largely comprised notes or summaries prepared by ENRC's lawyers of interviews with employees and third parties, as part of the investigation into possible corruption.  

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from