Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 DECEMBER 2014

Who Owns A Bribe?

Baker & Partners LLP
Baker & Partners LLP
Contributor
Baker & Partners LLP

Baker & Partners LLP

The Cayman Islands office was opened in late 2020 with Robert Jones as the sole attorney. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker & Partners LLP

Secret commissions and bribes have unfortunately become an increasingly common feature of doing business in certain parts of the world.

JerseyCriminal Law

Secret commissions and bribes have unfortunately become an increasingly common feature of doing business in certain parts of the world. The Jersey and UK courts have now provided the answer to the vexing question of who owns a bribe. Once established, ownership gives rise to an ability to trace the proceeds of a bribe or secret commission into the hands of a third party. That calls for an understanding of the different approaches to tracing, particularly when Jersey's differs from that adopted in the UK.

  1. On 16 July 2014, the UK Supreme Court handed down its judgment in FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC ("FHR").1 This decision settles a long-running argument as to whether a principal has a proprietary or a merely personal claim against an agent who takes a bribe or secret commission.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from