Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 AUGUST 2021

Enforcing The Undertaking In Damages – New Developments In Jersey

Baker & Partners LLP
Baker & Partners LLP
Contributor
Baker & Partners LLP

Baker & Partners LLP

The Cayman Islands office was opened in late 2020 with Robert Jones as the sole attorney. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker & Partners LLP

In Morelli v Morelli, the Royal Court of Jersey has for the first time ruled on the mechanism and approach by which an undertaking in damages, given pursuant to ex parte injunctive proceedings, is to be enforced.

JerseyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In  Morelli v Morelli, the Royal Court of Jersey has for the first time ruled on the mechanism and approach by which an undertaking in damages, given pursuant to ex parte injunctive proceedings, is to be enforced.

The court ultimately declined permission to enforce the undertaking in damages but has provided some useful guidance for practitioners and for those representing parties who become subject to injunctions granted by the Royal Court.

Background

The Plaintiffs obtained free-standing freezing injunctions in support of succession proceedings in Monaco. The injunctions bound the Defendants, who were the ultimate beneficial owners of a Jersey company called LBSI, and LBSI's corporate administrators (the "Parties Cited").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from