Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2016

Japan Legal Update Vol. 12 | March 2016

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The Anti-Avoidance Rule authorizes tax authorities to disallow a taxpayer's act or calculation if "the corporate tax burden is determined to have been unduly decreased" due to reorganization transactions...

JapanTax

Tax

First Supreme Court Decision on General Anti-Avoidance Rule Concerning Reorganization Transactions

On February 29, 2016, the Supreme Court (first petty bench) issued a decision describing the standards for applying the general anti-avoidance rule concerning reorganization transactions under Article 132-2 of the Japanese Corporate Tax Law (the "Anti-Avoidance Rule").

The Anti-Avoidance Rule authorizes tax authorities to disallow a taxpayer's act or calculation if "the corporate tax burden is determined to have been unduly decreased" due to reorganization transactions including, but not limited to, a merger. In this case, the surviving company (the "Taxpayer") in a tax-qualified merger claimed that it assumed the net operating losses of the acquired company and included the same in its deductible expenses. However, the relevant tax authority denied the above inclusion by applying the Anti-Avoidance Rule.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from