Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 OCTOBER 2017

MiFID II Transaction Reporting

Dillon Eustace
Dillon Eustace
Contributor
Dillon Eustace

Dillon Eustace

Dillon Eustace is one of Ireland’s leading law firms focusing on asset management and investment...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dillon Eustace

The three main reasons for requiring that details of transactions in financial instruments be reported to competent authorities are that transaction reporting enables the competent authorities:

IrelandWealth Management

Introduction

The three main reasons for requiring that details of transactions in financial instruments be reported to competent authorities are that transaction reporting enables the competent authorities:

  • to detect and investigate potential cases of market abuse
  • to monitor the fair and orderly functioning of markets, and
  • to monitor the activities of investment firms.

These may not give much comfort to those subject to the onerous reporting obligation, but they do give context to the regime described in this paper and to the requirement to not only identify the person responsible for execution of the transaction but also the person who made the investment decision.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from