Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 SEPTEMBER 2017

Regulating Hate Speech?

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Contributor
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Managing Partner: Will Carmody Chair: Philip Nolan Number of partners: 124 Languages: French,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Hate speech, and the role played by internet services providers, such as social media companies, in its regulation, has been the subject of much discussion.

IrelandMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Hate speech, and the role played by internet services providers, such as social media companies, in its regulation, has been the subject of much discussion. We examine the heightened regulatory activity concerning hate speech online and potential encroachment on the traditional immunities of online intermediaries regarding user-generated content.  

Immunity for user-generated content

Internet services providers, as 'mere conduits' and 'hosts' of information generally have legal immunity for user-generated content posted on their sites. This qualified guarantee of immunity has contributed to the development of the internet and social media around the world. In the EU, this protection is provided by Articles 12 to 15 of the eCommerce Directive 2000 and, in the US, by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from