Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 FEBRUARY 2026

Aviation Contracts And The Silent Role Of DGCA

Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants
Contributor
Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants

Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants

• Full-service law firm established in 2004 by Mr. Vipul Maheshwari, headquartered in New Delhi,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maheshwari & Co. Advocates & Legal Consultants

Some contracts require more than mutual assent, they require regulatory grace. Although Indian aviation contracts, particularly aircraft lease, wet lease, maintenance, and engine support agreements...

IndiaTransport
Himanshu Sachdeva
Himanshu Sachdeva

Some contracts require more than mutual assent, they require regulatory grace. Although Indian aviation contracts, particularly aircraft lease, wet lease, maintenance, and engine support agreements, are formally governed by the Indian Contract Act, 1872, yet their performance, continuation, and termination are inseparably conditioned on regulatory permissions issued under the Aircraft Act, 1934 and the Aircraft Rules, 1937. Unlike conventional commercial contracts, aviation agreements cannot be performed simply by mutual consent; they require continuous statutory validation through registration, airworthiness certification, and operational approval by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). Indian courts, however, have largely avoided analysing this dependence within contract doctrine. Instead, disputes arising from regulatory obstruction are resolved through writ jurisdiction, administrative law principles, or statutory interpretation. This article argues

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from