Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 DECEMBER 2024

Compensation Received Under An Arbitral Award Not "Other Income"

Majmudar & Partners
Majmudar & Partners
Contributor
Majmudar & Partners

Majmudar & Partners

Majmudar & Partners, established in 1943, is one of India’s premier law firms representing leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Majmudar & Partners

In 1998, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited ("MTNL") invited tenders for Code-Division Multiple Access ("CDMA") technology supply on a turnkey basis.

IndiaTax

Background

In 1998, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited ("MTNL") invited tenders for Code-Division Multiple Access ("CDMA") technology supply on a turnkey basis. In 1999, a contract was awarded to a joint venture between Fujitsu Ltd. ("Fujitsu"), a tax resident of Japan, and Fujitsu India Private Limited ("FIPL"), with FIPL designated as the lead partner. The project involved the supply of equipment and commissioning of a CDMA system for MTNL.

A dispute arose from the non-payment of dues under various purchase orders after commissioning and acceptance testing of the CDMA system by MTNL. In 2009, Fujitsu and FIPL invoked the arbitration clause and commenced arbitration proceedings against MTNL. During the assessment year 2019-20, Fujitsu received from MTNL compensation of the principal amount along with interest. In its tax return, Fujitsu classified the principal amount as "business income" and asserted that it was not taxable in India in the absence of a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from