Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 DECEMBER 2023

BSC Beacon NOV 23 Newsletter

The Assessee (Diversey India Hygiene Private Limited) was in receipt of several notices issued under Section 148 and Section 142(1) of the Act.

IndiaTax

I. Direct Taxes

A. Corporate Taxes

1. Hon'ble High Court of Mumbai1: Where the AO is aware about the non-existence of an entity, no notices or order should be issued in the name of the non-existent entity, even though the PAN of non-existing entity has not been deactivated.

Background

The Assessee (Diversey India Hygiene Private Limited) was in receipt of several notices issued under Section 148 and Section 142(1) of the Act. These notices were issued to a non-existent entity i.e. Diversey India Private Limited (DIPL). The Assessee argued that DIPL got amalgamated with the Assessee from 1 April 2015 and referred to rulings of PCIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. [416 ITR 163] and Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd v. CIT [186 ITR 278 (SC)], which held that the notices and assessment orders issued in the name of an amalgamated company that no longer exist are without jurisdiction and legally flawed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from