Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 NOVEMBER 2023

Whether A Writ Petition Under Article 226 And 227 Is Maintainable For Challenging Orders Of Arbitral Tribunals?

Stratage Law
Stratage Law
Contributor
Stratage Law

Stratage Law

Stratage Law Partners was incorporated in mid-August 2020. The firm is a specialized, solution-...

View firm profile
Explore more from Stratage Law

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the matter of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited vs. Om Construction and ors. has held that a Petition...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the matter of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited vs. Om Construction and ors. has held that a Petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 can be entertained only in exceptionally rare circumstances.

In the present case, the Petitioner had challenged (i) an Order dated December 12, 2022, passed by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court appointing an Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and (ii) an Order dated September 16, 2023, passed by the Ld. Arbitrator, wherein the Ld. Arbitrator rejected the Petitioner's application under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and held that the Ld. Arbitrator had the jurisdiction to decide the matter. The Hon'ble Bombay High Court, relying upon the case of S.B.P. and Co. vs Patel Engineering Ltd., held that:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The contents of this article do not necessarily reflect the views/position of Stratage Law Partners but remain solely those of the author(s). This article is meant for general information and shall not be deemed to be a legal advice or opinion. This article is neither intended to be an advertisement or solicitation.

See more popular content from