Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JANUARY 2019

Supreme Court Settles The "Seat" vs "Venue" Debate

Arbitration agreements must be read in a holistic manner to determine the seat and correspondingly the jurisdiction of the supervisory court, if the seat or place of arbitration is not specified in the arbitration...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Subject: Arbitration . Other related subjects: Administration of justice.

Keywords: Arbitration awards; Arbitration clauses; India; Interpretation; Jurisdiction; Seat of arbitration; Setting aside;

Legislation:

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (India) s.34

Case:

Union of India v Hardy Exploration and Production (India) Inc unreported 2018 (Sup Ct (Ind))

*Int. A.L.R. N-25 Summary

Arbitration agreements must be read in a holistic manner to determine the seat and correspondingly the jurisdiction of the supervisory court, if the seat or place of arbitration is not specified in the arbitration agreement between parties. If the parties have agreed on a "venue" but not a "seat" in their arbitration agreement, courts must look at appended or attached factors to determine the seat of arbitration. Determination, as referred to in art.20(1) of the UNCITRAL Model Law, signifies an expressive opinion.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from