Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 NOVEMBER 2023

Supreme Court's Directions For Ensuring Speedy Justice

Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Contributor
Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal is a leading full-service Indian law firm, founded in 2008, providing comprehensive...

View firm profile
Explore more from Phoenix Legal

A Two-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India, in the case of Yashpal Jain vs. Sushila Devi & Ors, recognized the significant delays within the judicial system and emphasized the importance of taking proactive measures.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

A Two-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India (Court), in the case of Yashpal Jain vs. Sushila Devi & Ors1, recognized the significant delays within the judicial system and emphasized the importance of taking proactive measures. They highlighted the necessity to not only reduce the substantial backlog of cases at all levels but also to prepare for meeting the aspirations of the litigant public. As a result, the Hon'ble Court issued 12 directions to all the High Courts to untangle the web of delay and pendency and ensure the speedy delivery of justice.Top of Form

Facts of the case

In the present case, a suit initiated in 1982, seeking a declaration of the sale deed as null and void, and a decree for possession of the properties, remained pending for 41 years. The Supreme Court observed that the 41-year delay in adjudicating the suit highlights the way certain civil courts are functioning and reveals how various parties involved are contributing to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from