Introduction
A Two-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India
(Court), in the case of Yashpal Jain vs. Sushila
Devi & Ors1, recognized the significant delays
within the judicial system and emphasized the importance of taking
proactive measures. They highlighted the necessity to not only
reduce the substantial backlog of cases at all levels but also to
prepare for meeting the aspirations of the litigant public. As a
result, the Hon'ble Court issued 12 directions to all the High
Courts to untangle the web of delay and pendency and ensure the
speedy delivery of justice.Top of Form
Facts of the case
In the present case, a suit initiated in 1982, seeking a
declaration of the sale deed as null and void, and a decree for
possession of the properties, remained pending for 41 years. The
Supreme Court observed that the 41-year delay in adjudicating the
suit highlights the way certain civil courts are functioning and
reveals how various parties involved are contributing to