ARTICLE · 14 APRIL 2021

Indian Arbitration Quarterly Roundup 2021 (January 2021 To March 2021)

Phoenix Legal

Contributor

Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal is a leading full-service Indian law firm, founded in 2008, providing comprehensive...

View firm profile

Explore more from Phoenix Legal

In recent times, several noteworthy judgments have been rendered by the Indian Courts in matters involving the arbitration law.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Saurabh Babulkar

Author LinkedIn connections

In recent times, several noteworthy judgments have been rendered by the Indian Courts in matters involving the arbitration law. Some decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court that discuss and set out the legal position concerning the interpretation and applicability of provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 rendered in the first quarter of 2021 have been summarised below:

Bhaven Construction through Authorised Signatory Premjibhai K. Shah v. Executive Engineer Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd. and Anr.

Citation: 2021 SCC OnLine SC 8

Decided on: 6 January 2021

Discretionary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are not to be invoked to interfere with the arbitral process under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 under ordinary circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Indian Arbitration Quarterly Roundup 2021 (January 2021 To March 2021)

Discretionary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are not to be invoked to interfere with the arbitral process under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 under ordinary circumstances.

Related Articles

Judicial Powers Under Section 34 Of The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996: A Critical Analysis Of The Supreme Court’s Ruling In Gayatri Balasamy V. Isg Novasoft Technologies Limited

Bombay High Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator, Says Replacement Of Tender Arbitration Clause Not Shown Clearly At Section 11 Stage

Delhi High Court Refuses To Restrain Encashment Of Performance Bank Guarantee, Says Invocation Need Not Specify Amount Recoverable

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator Appointed Under Section 84 Of The MSCS Act, Says Section 21 Notice Not Required

Arbitration Clause In Accepted Invoices Binds The Parties Despite The Absence Of A Separate Signature At The Section 11 Stage

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

Litigation

International Arbitration

Class Actions

See more popular content from

Different Types Of Panchanama In Law

Cheque Bounce Cases: Presumptions And Procedure Under The NI Act

Section 354 In The Indian Penal Code: Outraging The Modesty Of A Woman – Complete Explanation IPC

Execution Of Court Order | Best Lawyer For Execution Petition

Decree Execution Under Order XXI CPC – An In-depth Insight

Article 21 Of The Indian Constitution: A Comprehensive Analysis Of The Right To Life And Personal Liberty

An Overview Of Lok Adalat Process In India

Section 138 Of The Negotiable Instruments Act: What The Supreme Court’s New Procedural Guidelines Mean For Cheque-Bounce Cases

Litigation Update I Supreme Court Clarifies Limitation Law For Possession Suits Based On Void Sale Deeds

Government Of NCT Delhi Notifies Court Fees (Delhi Amendment) Act 2026 To Amend The Court Fees Act, 1870 As Applicable In National Territory Of Delhi

Newsletter August Disputes

Moratorium Declared Under Section 14 Of The IBC Does Not Apply To Proceedings In Respect Of Directors Or Management Of Corporate Debtor: Supreme Court Of India

Drawing The Line: Supreme Court Reaffirms The Administrative Role Of Sub-Registrars In K Gopi v. Sub-Registrar

NCLAT Prohibits Substitution Of Resolution Applicant After CoC's Approval Of The Resolution Plan

Essar Steel Verdict: A Watershed Moment In India's Insolvency Regime

NCLT Delhi Clarifies: Unpaid Dues Under A Settlement Agreement Is Not An ‘Operational Debt' Under IBC

Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code 2016 Passed By Parliament

Right Of The High Court To Intervene When NCLT Passes An Order Pertaining To Public Law

Competition Monthly - September 2026 Edition

Draconian Penalty Under Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Not Automatic