Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MAY 2021

Confusion Settled: Two Indian Parties Can Choose A Foreign Seat

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Contributor
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

Founded on a century of legal achievements, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co (SAM & Co) was born...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co

On 20 April 2021, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India, in PASL Wind Solutions Private Limited v. GE Power Conversion India Private Limited (PASL Wind Solutions)...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Shreya Gupta
Shreya Gupta
Juhi Gupta
Juhi Gupta
Author LinkedIn connections

On 20 April 2021, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India, in PASL Wind Solutions Private Limited v. GE Power Conversion India Private Limited1 (PASL Wind Solutions), conclusively decided the question of whether two Indian parties can choose a foreign seat of arbitration. Before the Supreme Court's decision, the High Courts were divided on this issue. For example, the Bombay High Court had taken the view that permitting two Indian parties to choose a foreign seat would violate the public policy of India.2 The Delhi High Court3 and the Madhya Pradesh High Court,4 on the other hand, took the view that Indian parties were free to choose any seat of arbitration, even if it is outside India.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from