Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 OCTOBER 2018

Between The Lines... September, 2018

The Supreme Court observed that a separate moratorium is applicable in the case of personal guarantors under Sections 96 and 101 of the IBC.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Article by Vijay Pal Dalmia, Advocate, Supreme Court of India and Delhi High Court, Partner & Head of Intellectual Property Laws Division, Vaish Associates Advocates, India

I. Moratorium passed against the Corporate Debtor is not applicable to Personal Guarantor: Supreme Court decides in favour of Creditor while setting aside the judgement of NCLAT

In case of State Bank of India v. Mr. V. Ramakrishnan and Others (decided on August 14, 2018), the Hon'ble Supreme Court resolved the issue relating to applicability of moratorium passed under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC") on the corporate debtor, against the personal guarantor, where the insolvency proceedings have commenced prior to coming into force of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2018 ("Amendment Act, 2018").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

© 2026, Vaish Associates Advocates,
All rights reserved
Advocates, 1st & 11th Floors, Mohan Dev Building 13, Tolstoy Marg New Delhi-110001 (India).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

See more popular content from