Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JULY 2025

Arbitral Proceedings Invalidated Due To Unilateral Appointment During CIRP Moratorium: Delhi High Court

In Ballarpur Industries Ltd. v. SG Enterprises [2025:DHC:4232], the Delhi High Court addressed two key legal issues:

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

In Ballarpur Industries Ltd. v. SG Enterprises [2025:DHC:4232], the Delhi High Court addressed two key legal issues: (i) whether the mandate of a unilaterally appointed sole arbitrator may be terminated under Section 14(1)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act"); and (ii) whether arbitration claims persist if they are not included in an approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC").

Brief Facts

The parties entered into a Distribution Agreement on 1 July 2009, relating to the supply and sale of stationery products. The agreement contained an arbitration clause requiring the parties to attempt to resolve disputes amicably first. If they failed to reach a resolution, a single arbitrator was to be appointed by mutual agreement. If no agreement was reached on the arbitrator, the Managing Director of the respondent company was authorised to make the appointment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from