The Calcutta High Court in a recent ruling in The Director General, National Library, Ministry of Culture, Government of India v. Expression 360 Services India Pvt. Ltd. [AP-COM/860/2024]...

In NBCC (India) Limited v. Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court of India ruled that simply mentioning another contract in an agreement would not automatically lead to incorporation of the arbitration clause in the subsequent agreement.

The present article provides a summary of the judgment passed by the High Court of Delhi in the case of Union of India vs. Rishabh Constructions Pvt. Ltd.

The Chhattisgarh High Court in Hira Carbonics Private Limited v. Kunwar Virendra Singh Patel [2025:CGHS:2571], examined an important procedural question in arbitration law: whether additional documents can be introduced at the stage of a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Delhi High Court, in a recent judgment in Las Ground Force Pvt. Ltd. v. Goldair Handling S.A [2024 DHC 9528] dealt with the enforcement of a non-compete clauses at the stage of granting interim reliefs within the framework of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act").

In a recent decision in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. v. HCC Samsung JV , the High Court of Delhi has reaffirmed the principle that parties cannot use a meritless application under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act") to extend the limitation period for filing a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

In a recent decision, the Calcutta High Court in Amjad Hossain v. the State of West Bengal has reaffirmed an important constitutional principle: when an authority falling within the definition...

In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court, in Idemia Syscom India Private Limited v. M/s Conjoinix Total Solutions Private Limited [2025:DHC:1205], dismissed a petition seeking the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("A&C Act").

The Delhi High Court delivered an important judgment in the case of Delhi Skills Mission Society (DSMS) vs. Samuel Foundation Charitable India Trust (SFCT).

In a landmark ruling, the Full Bench of the Delhi High Court adjudicated upon conflicting views taken by different Division Benches on whether procedural defects, such as the absence of a Statement of Truth or non-filing of the arbitral award.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court, in Alliance Enterprises v. Andhra Pradesh State Fiber Net Limited (APSFL) [Arb. Appl. No. 48 of 2023], ruled in favour of appointing an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("A&C Act").

The Madhya Pradesh High Court in Gokul Bansal v. Vipin Goyal [Arbitration Case No. 44 of 2021] addressed an important question concerning the arbitrability of partnership disputes, particularly when they involve immovable property.

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court of India in Bhudev Mallick alias Bhudeb Mallick v. Ranajit Ghoshal [2025 INSC 175] examined the enforceability of decrees of permanent injunction...

In the case of M.I. Mohammed v. HLL Life Care Ltd. [2025:KER:38884], the Kerala High Court was once again called upon to decide the implications of the unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator by one of the parties to an arbitration agreement.

In India, addressing the maintainability of writ petitions in matters amenable to arbitration poses a delicate legal challenge.

The judgment in Synergies Casting Ltd. v. National Research Development Corporation [2025 DHC 133 DB], rendered by the Delhi High Court, is an important ruling that addresses questions regarding the

In a recent decision in Vidyawati Construction Company v. Union of India , the Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the jurisdiction of a sole arbitrator appointed in deviation from the contractual arbitration clause.

In a recent judgment in EBIX Cash Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra , the High Court of Bombay ("Bombay High Court") addressed the scope of writ jurisdiction in contractual disputes involving state enterprises.

In a recent decision in Gopal Krishan Rathi v. Dr. R. Palani , the Madras High Court reaffirmed a crucial principle in arbitration law: an arbitral award need not conform to a rigid format so long...

The Delhi High Court in M/s Indure Pvt. Ltd. v. Aneja Construction (India) Ltd. [2024:DHC:9861] reaffirmed the principle that statutory timelines for challenging arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("A&C Act") are sacrosanct.