Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JANUARY 2022

Walmart Apollo Llc. Vs. Aayush Jain & Anr.: A Case Analysis

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

India, as a mixed market, has a diverse range of industries that function on a free-market basis. In the market system, there is fierce competition.

IndiaIntellectual Property
Anuja Saraswat
Anuja Saraswat
Author LinkedIn connections

Introduction:

India, as a mixed market, has a diverse range of industries that function on a free-market basis. In the market system, there is fierce competition. Any business that wants to succeed in the free market must have brand recognition and value. Trademarks are the most straightforward way to accomplish this. However, the Squatting of trademarks and registering of identical and/or deceptively similar trademarks has been a never-ending problem for registered and prior users of trademarks in recent years. Any application for registration of a trademark that is identical or deceptively similar to an already registered brand in order to profit from goodwill and reputation is considered bad faith. Walmart Apollo LLC. Vs. Aayush Jain & Anr. (2021) is a recent case in which Walmart Apollo (Plaintiff) sued Aayush Jain & Anr. (Defendant) for trademark and copyright infringement over its marks in the Delhi High Court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Amendment Rules, 2026: Enhancing Transparency And Consumer Protection In E-Commerce

The Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Amendment Rules, 2026 introduce significant compliance obligations for e-commerce platforms, particularly regarding the disclosure of Country of Origin and other product information. This article analyses the key amendments, their implications for manufacturers, importers, and online marketplaces, and the broader objectives of strengthening consumer protection in the digital marketplace.
IndiaConsumer Protection
Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys