Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MARCH 2022

TM And Design Patent Conflict

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

For long, when we compare the trademark with that of a design, the inclusion of trademark in the design was not meant much when we talk about the design patent infringement analysis.

IndiaIntellectual Property

For long, when we compare the trademark with that of a design, the inclusion of trademark in the design was not meant much when we talk about the design patent infringement analysis. In one of the recent cases of Columbia Sportswear North America Inc. vs. Seirus Innovative Accessories Inc., where it was put to question that whether any such inclusion or a trademark's appearance and placement might "give an ordinary observer a different visual impression" than the patented design. 3:17-cv-01781 (S.D. Cal Aug. 6, 2021). The jury was of the view that the design patent at issue was not infringed if the accused design included a trademark. This verdict departs from the precedent from Federal Circuit in L.A. Gear v. Thom McAn Shoe Co., 988 F.2d 1117, 1126 (Fed. Cir. 1993), where it held that including a mark or labelling does not avoid design patent infringement as shown in the following shoe design and accused shoe.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from