Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 AUGUST 2024

JSA Prism | Insolvency | August 2024

JSA Advocates & Solicitors
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
Contributor
JSA Advocates & Solicitors

JSA Advocates & Solicitors

Established in 1991 Our services: JSA is a leading law firm in India with more than 600...

View firm profile
Explore more from JSA Advocates & Solicitors

The Madras High Court ("Madras HC") in its recent judgement National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd vs. Superintending Engineer TANGEDCO and Anr.

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Clean slate theory cannot be used to extinguish known claims when the promoter of a micro, small and medium enterprise is a successful resolution applicant under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

The Madras High Court ("Madras HC") in its recent judgement National Sewing Thread Co. Ltd vs. Superintending Engineer TANGEDCO and Anr.1, has held that the clean slate theory ("CST") does not extinguish undisclosed claims under the resolution plan of the erstwhile promoters or management ("Promoter Group"). The Madras HC has further held that in relation to such claims, the Promoter Group is jointly and severally liable. This judgement of the Madras HC is significant since it: (a) carves out an exception for the CST, especially when the Promoter Group of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises ("MSMEs") are the successful resolution applicant; (b) protects the creditors who did not submit claims during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process ("CIRP") for want of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from