Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 AUGUST 2024

Insufficient Stamp Duty –Ruining IBC Plans?

The seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court in N N Global1 had an opportunity to conclusively decide on the admissibility of the unstamped (or insufficiently stamped) documents.

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

The seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court in N N Global1  had an opportunity to conclusively decide on the admissibility of the unstamped (or insufficiently stamped) documents. But unfortunately the Court looked at the issue with a narrow lens and restricted itself to the referral under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This was not the first time that the Supreme Court was called on to adjudicate on this issue, and in fact, the time spent by the Court on this is concerning.

The time is definitely a major factor in insolvency proceedings. And despite the insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended (“IBC”) being summary in nature, the tribunals spend (and are routinely forced to spend) inordinate time to dispose of matters. One such issue that is clogging the tribunals is the unstamped documents. We briefly discuss below on this issue.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The above is a generic analysis and should not be regarded as a substitute for specific advice based on the facts of a client’s objectives and specific commercial agreements reached. Please do reach out to us at [email protected] for any queries.

See more popular content from