Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 SEPTEMBER 2017

The Foreign Direct Investment Policy 2017 Notified By DIPP

Dhir & Dhir Associates
Dhir & Dhir Associates
Contributor
Dhir & Dhir Associates

Dhir & Dhir Associates

Dhir & Dhir Associates is a full-service law firm founded in 1993 to serve as a singlewindow...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dhir & Dhir Associates

The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) has notified India's Consolidated Foreign Direct Investment Policy 2017 ("FDI Policy 2017"), effective from August 28, 2017.

IndiaGovernment, Public Sector
Dhir & Dhir Associates
Dhir & Dhir Associates
Author LinkedIn connections

The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) has notified India's Consolidated Foreign Direct Investment Policy 2017 ("FDI Policy 2017"), effective from August 28, 2017. The FDI Policy 2017 is a consolidation of the various decisions taken by the Government of India in the past one year. The present consolidation subsumes and supersedes all Press Notes/Press Releases/Clarifications/Circulars, which were in force as on August 28, 2017 and reflects the FDI policy as on August 28, 2017.

During the last one year, the Government has liberalised FDI regime by easing norms for a host of important sectors such as Defence, Civil Aviation, Pharmaceuticals, Private Security, Broadcasting etc. to boost FDI investment. Most of the changes have already been notified by the DIPP and Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which are now consolidated in the present FDI Policy 2017.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

See more popular content from

Article

Punjab And Haryana High Court Strikes Down JAO - FAO Retrospective Amendment As Unconstitutional

The Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court (HC) in Jyoti Sareen vs. UOI & Others (CWP No. 15791-2024 (O&M)) (Order) held the retrospective amendments carried out vide the Finance Act, 2026, with respect to the powers of the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) to issue a reopening notice under section 148 (Reopening Notice) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (IT Act), as unconstitutional, being violative of the ‘doctrine of separation of powers’ and thus violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
IndiaGovernment, Public Sector
Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Article

Acquisition By An FOCC Of An Indian Company: Pricing Conditions For Resident And Non-resident Shareholders

A FOCC refers to an Indian entity that has received foreign investment and is ultimately owned or controlled by persons resident outside India. Although incorporated in India under the Companies Act, such entities are treated differently from domestically owned and controlled Indian companies for the purposes of foreign investment regulation and downstream investment structuring. Consequently, an FOCC, despite being an Indian incorporated entity, is subject to regulatory conditions applicable to foreign investment while undertaking investments into other Indian entities.
IndiaGovernment, Public Sector
LegaLogic
LegaLogic
Article

The Evolution Of Workplace Sexual Harassment Law In India: From Vishaka To POSH

This article covers the evolution of laws in India on sexual harassment in the workplace, starting from the shortcomings of the pre-1997 law and leading to the introduction of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (“POSH Act”). It examines the impact of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; the lack of any specific remedy for sexual harassment at the workplace; the Bhanwari Devi incident; and, thereafter, the judgment in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan on the constitutional and judicial recognition of sexual harassment at the workplace as a violation of fundamental rights.
IndiaEmployment and HR
Dhir & Dhir Associates
Dhir & Dhir Associates
Article

INSOLVENCY MEETS ARBITRATION Convergence, Conflict, And Co-Existence In Asia

Insolvency and arbitration have traditionally occupied separate spaces: one collective and court-supervised, the other private and consent-based. That separation is breaking down. Across Asia, distressed companies are parties to ongoing arbitral proceedings, arbitral awards are being pursued against insolvent entities, and restructuring moratoria are colliding with arbitral proceedings in ways that neither the law of insolvency nor the law of arbitration has cleanly resolved.
IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Dhir & Dhir Associates
Dhir & Dhir Associates