Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MARCH 2020

Substance Over Form Invoked Once Again! AAR Denies Indo- Mauritius DTAA Benefits

King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Contributor
King, Stubb & Kasiva

King, Stubb & Kasiva

King Stubb & Kasiva is few of the top corporate law firms in India with offices in Bengaluru,...

View firm profile
Explore more from King, Stubb & Kasiva

Investments by the foreign investors in India through the Mauritius route has always been a contentious issue, from the Indian taxation perspective.

IndiaGovernment, Public Sector

Investments by the foreign investors in India through the Mauritius route has always been a contentious issue, from the Indian taxation perspective. The Hon'ble High Courts of various states and the Authority for Advance Ruling ("AAR") have revisited the provisions of the India – Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ("DTAA") (specifically Article 13 which deals with the taxation of the capital gains) time and again. The denial of tax benefits by the tax authorities has led to such revisions. According to them, the transactions are structured with the sole purpose of taking advantage of the provisions of the DTAA. The AAR, in its recent ruling dated February 10, 20201, denied capital tax benefits to a resident of Mauritius and held that the entire transaction was structured to avoid capital gains tax ("CGT") in India.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

https://ksandk.com/

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from