Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MAY 2026

Healthcare & Ethics: India’s First Judicially Sanctioned Passive Euthanasia

Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Explore more from Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

In a landmark decision that marked India’s first judicially sanctioned case of passive euthanasia, the Supreme Court in March 2026 delivered its order in Harish Rana v. Union of India, permitting the withdrawal of life support from a patient who had remained in a Persistent Vegetative State (PVS) for 13 years following a road accident.

IndiaGovernment, Public Sector

In a landmark decision that marked India’s first judicially sanctioned case of passive euthanasia, the Supreme Court in March 2026 delivered its order in Harish Rana v. Union of India, permitting the withdrawal of life support from a patient who had remained in a Persistent Vegetative State (PVS) for 13 years following a road accident. This ruling applied the framework established in the landmark Common Cause v. Union of India (2018) judgment, representing a profound evolution in the constitutional right to die with dignity under Article 21. By classifying clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) as medical treatment rather than basic care, and applying a rigorous “best interests” standard, the Court navigated complex medical ethics while expanding end-of-life autonomy in deeply personal circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from