Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 AUGUST 2015

Corporate Criminal Liability: Revisiting Iridium

The complexity shrouding the issue of criminality of a corporation was settled by the Supreme Court ("SC") in Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. Motorola Inc. case.

IndiaCriminal Law

Introduction

The complexity shrouding the issue of criminality of a corporation was settled by the Supreme Court ("SC") in Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. Motorola Inc.1 case. In January 2015, it got an opportunity to decide criminal liability of corporate officers for the acts of a company and to examine the principle of alter ego. This recent ruling in Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation ("CBI") and Others2 once again chartered into the territory of the corporate criminal liability and relied on Iridium case to determine the issue at hand.

This newsletter discusses the principle of attribution, which talks about the identification of the person whose acts will be instrumental in imputing criminal liability to the company. It touches upon the evolution in the concept of attributing mens rea to a company by analyzing the case of Iridium and Sunil Bharti Mittal.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from