Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 DECEMBER 2023

Arbitration Clauses & Insolvent Winding Up Proceedings: The Cayman Anomaly

Appleby
Appleby
Contributor
Appleby

Appleby

Appleby is a leading offshore law firm. The team of legal specialists advise global public and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Appleby

In FamilyMart the Privy Council confirmed that distinct legal and factual issues raised in just and equitable winding up proceedings are arbitrable. It follows that arbitration clauses...

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Much has been written in the wake of the Privy Council's decision in FamilyMart China Holding Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp about how Cayman is a pro-arbitration jurisdiction. In this article, we consider the recent Grand Court decision in Re BPGIC Holdings Ltd and ask whether Cayman is as pro-arbitration in the context of insolvent winding up proceedings.Much has been written in the wake of the Privy Council's decision in FamilyMart China Holding Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp about how Cayman is a pro-arbitration jurisdiction. In this article, we consider the recent Grand Court decision in Re BPGIC Holdings Ltd and ask whether Cayman is as pro-arbitration in the context of insolvent winding up proceedings.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from