In Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd,1 the Grand Court confirmed that it has jurisdiction to appoint provisional liquidators notwithstanding the fact that the company's shareholders are engaged in an arbitration over its affairs, as mandated by a binding arbitration agreement. This article considers the decision and its implications.
INTRODUCTION
In recent years courts around the world have grappled with the interaction between arbitration and winding up proceedings – both in the context of creditors' petitions and just and equitable petitions involving shareholder disputes.2 Most notably, in the Cayman Islands, the Privy Council in FamilyMart China Holding Co Ltd v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp (FamilyMart) considered how the presence of a binding arbitration agreement between the parties affected the resolution of just and equitable winding proceedings. The effect of the Board's decision was that there would be a bifurcated process: legal and