Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 SEPTEMBER 2026

Mistake, Pattern, Or Deceptive Scheme? A Forensic Expert’s Framework For Evaluating Deceptive Trade Practices Allegations

Independent special committee investigations are gaining prominence in bankruptcy and restructuring as stakeholders demand greater transparency and accountability. Organizations are leveraging AI and data analytics to transform business intelligence into actionable decision intelligence, while navigating complex regulatory landscapes from stablecoin certification to third-party distribution risks.

GlobalCorporate/Commercial Law

Regulators are taking a closer look at how companies describe what they sell. In April 2026, following a March 2026 executive order on truthful “Made in America” advertising, the Federal Trade Commission announced a “Made in the USA” series of enforcement actions against companies that advertised their products as American made when the products, or key components of those products, came from outside the United States. Recent enforcement actions have included a manufacturer that completed assembly in the United States but relied on imported chips, cameras, and monitors; a footwear company that sourced key components from the Dominican Republic and Brazil; and a U.S. flag seller that marketed products as American-made even though they were manufactured entirely in China. These cases highlighted recurring deceptive-practice issues, including false country-of-origin claims, unsubstantiated advertising and labeling, and undisclosed foreign content.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from