Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JANUARY 2020

FCPA Digest, January 2020 – Perenial Statutory Issues

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

The enforcement actions in 2019, like the year before it, largely failed to generate any new or surprising issues related to the...

GlobalCorporate/Commercial Law

The enforcement actions in 2019, like the year before it, largely failed to generate any new or surprising issues related to the FCPA's statutory regime. Instead, we mostly observed a continuation of past issues, with the DOJ and SEC buckling themselves as they pushed the boundaries of the FCPA's definitions and scopes.

JURISDICTION

The application of the FCPA's territorial jurisdiction provision to foreign persons and the contours of how to define "while in the United States" under § 78dd-3 have been areas in which the DOJ and SEC have been creatively pushing the boundaries. As we noted in the July 2019 Trends & Patterns, in the Fresenius matter, the DOJ and SEC based their jurisdictional hook solely on the use of internet-based email accounts hosted by service providers in the United States. Neither agency alleges that any of the actors involved in the misconduct had any presence in the United States while they acted in furtherance of the corrupt scheme, nor any

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from