Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2020

Federal Court Confirms Respondents Should Be Heard In Preliminary Injunction Requests

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Contributor
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

At Fross Zelnick, we secure and defend our clients’ most valuable assets—their brands, designs, and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

Germany is known as a jurisdiction where ex parte preliminary injunctions are relatively easy to obtain.

GermanyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Gewerkschaft der Polizei – Bundespolizei v. Deutsche Polizeigewerkschaft (case no. 1 BvR 1246/20)

Germany is known as a jurisdiction where ex parte preliminary injunctions are relatively easy to obtain.  But in a June 3, 2020 decision (case no. 1 BvR 1246/20), the German Federal Constitutional Court ("FCC") highlighted the importance of allowing a respondent to be heard in response to a request for a preliminary injunction ("PI"). The FCC held that the "procedural right to equality of arms," equal to a fundamental right, is fulfilled only if the respondent has an opportunity to comment on the allegations made in the PI request.  For example, if the arguments presented in the PI request differ from those in a prior warning letter, then the respondent's response letter cannot be the only submission under consideration.  In other words, if the prior warning letter set forth the full scope of the petitioner's arguments, then a full and complete response thereto would be

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from