Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MARCH 2011

Newsletter Antitrust Law – September 2010

In a judgement dated 14 September 2010 in the matter Akzo Nobel Chemicals and Akcros Chemicals/Commission (Case C-550/07 P), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has reconfirmed that the internal correspondence with in-house counsel/staff lawyers within a company is not protected by the confidentiality extended to communications between clients and lawyers (legal privilege).

GermanyAntitrust/Competition Law
Gert Dittert
Gert Dittert
Georg Lecheler
Georg Lecheler
Author LinkedIn connections

In a judgement dated 14 September 2010 in the matter Akzo Nobel Chemicals and Akcros Chemicals/Commission (Case C-550/07 P), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has reconfirmed that the internal correspondence with in-house counsel/staff lawyers within a company is not protected by the confidentiality extended to communications between clients and lawyers (legal privilege). This judgement conclusively establishes that companies will have to tolerate investigations and, where necessary, the securing of correspondence exchanged between staff lawyers and company employees by the European Commission, if the purpose of such investigations is to procure evidence of unfair competitive practices.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from