Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JUNE 2021

Even "Narrow" Best Price Clauses Are Not Narrow Enough

On May 18, 2021, the Federal Court of Justice ("FCJ") ruled that Booking.com's "narrow" best price clause violates Article 101 (1) TFEU (the cartel prohibition) as well.

GermanyAntitrust/Competition Law

On May 18, 2021, the Federal Court of Justice ("FCJ") ruled that Booking.com's "narrow" best price clause violates Article 101 (1) TFEU (the cartel prohibition) as well. Thereby the FCJ overruled the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf which held that "narrow" best price clauses were not anti-competitive, but an ancillary restraint necessary to carry out the – otherwise neutral – platform contract entered into between Booking.com and the participating hotels using the platform ("ancillary restraints doctrine").

"Narrow" best price clauses as restraints of competition

Booking.com operated a clause, that prohibited participating hotels from offering their rooms on their own website at lower prices or other more favourable conditions than on Booking.com ("narrow" best price clause). However, Booking.com did not restrict participating hotels from offering rooms at lower prices on competing online booking portals or offline without online advertisement (like it would

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from