Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 AUGUST 2009

Paris Competition Bulletin - July 2009

In a notable judgement of 4 June 2009, the T-Mobile case, the European Court of Justice (the "ECJ") gave important clarifications on the concept of concerted practice under Article 81(1) EC.

FranceAntitrust/Competition Law
Melanie Thill-Tayara
Melanie Thill-Tayara
Emmanuelle Van Den Broucke
Emmanuelle Van Den Broucke
Marta Giner
Marta Giner

THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE GIVES IMPORTANT CLARIFICATIONS ON CONCERTED PRACTICES

In a notable judgement of 4 June 2009, the T-Mobile case, the European Court of Justice (the "ECJ") gave important clarifications on the concept of concerted practice under Article 81(1) EC.

The case arose out of a preliminary reference posed by the Dutch jurisdiction hearing an appeal against fines imposed by the Dutch competition authority on the five leading operators on the Dutch mobile phone market. The judgment is particularly interesting for three reasons.

Firstly, the ECJ confirmed that concerted practices, in this case information exchanges, can be anticompetitive by object and thus require no examination of their effects on the market. The ECJ held that, for a concerted practice to have an anti-competitive object, it is sufficient that it is capable, in its legal and economic circumstances, of affecting competition. The extent to which competition is actually affected

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from