Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 MARCH 2026

EU Tax Alert 214

Loyens & Loeff
Loyens & Loeff
Contributor
Loyens & Loeff

Loyens & Loeff

One firm: Law and Tax Loyens & Loeff is a leading independent, full-service law and tax firm in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Loyens & Loeff

The new edition of the EU Tax Alert is available. With this publication we would like to keep you informed about the latest developments on EU tax law. We have summarised the highlights of this edition below.

European UnionTax

The new edition of the EU Tax Alert is available. With this publication we would like to keep you informed about the latest developments on EU tax law. We have summarised the highlights of this edition below.

CJ judgment on whether Belgium correctly implemented the CFC rules under the ATAD

(Commission v Belgium, C-524/23)

On 26 February 2026, the Court of Justice (CJ), delivered its judgment in the case Commission v Belgium (Case C‑524/23). The case concerns the alleged failure by the Kingdom of Belgium to transpose Article 8(7) of Directive (EU) 2016/1164 (the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive, ATAD), which requires Member States to allow a deduction for taxes paid by a controlled foreign company (CFC) abroad, when its income is attributed to the domestic taxpayer. The central legal issue addressed by the CJ in this case is whether the provision mentioned above must be implemented when a Member State opts for the CFC regime set out in Article 7(2)(b) ATAD, which

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from