Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2022

CJEU Held That DAC6 Violates The Lawyer-client Privilege

Atoz Tax Advisers
Atoz Tax Advisers
Contributor
Atoz Tax Advisers

Atoz Tax Advisers

Our firm Founded in 2004, ATOZ Tax Advisers is a leading independent tax advisory firm offering a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Atoz Tax Advisers

Under the Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 of 25 May 2018 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation in relation...

European UnionTax

Under the Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 of 25 May 2018 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information  in the field of taxation in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements (known as "DAC6"), EU tax intermediaries such as tax advisers, accountants and lawyers that design and/or promote tax planning schemes, have to report potentially aggressive cross-border tax planning arrangements to the competent tax authorities.

On 8 December 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") held its decision in the case Orde van Vlaamse Balies, IG, Belgian Association of Tax Lawyers, CD, JU vs. Vlaamse Regering (Case C-694/20) regarding the obligations of lawyers under DAC6 (the Mandatory Disclosure Regime, "MDR").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from