Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 AUGUST 2024

The Vifor Case: Disparagement Reloaded?

On July 22, 2024, the European Commission (EC) accepted commitments proposed by Vifor Pharmaceuticals to address disparagement concerns under Article 102 TFEU.

European UnionAntitrust/Competition Law

On July 22, 2024, the European Commission (EC) accepted commitments proposed by Vifor Pharmaceuticals to address disparagement concerns under Article 102 TFEU. This is the EC's first pure disparagement case and its second investigation into disparagement practices in the pharmaceutical industry. The only other ongoing investigation into disparagement, concerning Teva Pharmaceuticals, is still underway, though its conclusion is much anticipated given that it will address the alleged misuse of divisional patents and disparagement of competitors in order to safeguard its multiple sclerosis treatment, Copaxone.*

In Depth

Procedural Background

Disparagement, or, disseminating negative and often misleading information about a competitor's products to discourage its use, is an important topic in light of the on-going debate in the Directorate-General for Competition (DG COMP) about the evolution of Article 102 of the TFEU. The EC published draft guidelines

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from